Again, there is no software differences between them – instead, it’s purely the materials used on the outside. However, inside, all versions are identical. There are a number of versions of the Fenix3 that have different exterior surfaces. So – with that intro, let’s get into things. Also, because the technology world constantly changes, I try and go back and update these reviews as new features and functionality are added – or if bugs are fixed. But, if I’ve missed something or if you spot something that doesn’t quite jive – just let me know and I’ll be happy to get it all sorted out. I write these reviews because I’m inherently a curious person with a technology background, and thus I try and be as complete as I can.
Lastly, at the end of the day keep in mind I’m just like any other regular athlete out there. Like always, I’ll be shipping that back to them in Kansas in the next little bit and going out and getting my own via regular retail channels. To be clear, I’ve been using a Fenix3 provided by Garmin to test with (final production unit). I’ve been using the Fenix3 for quite some time, and after a month on a final production unit with final production version – I’ve got enough data and detail for the in-depth review. But, the appeal to triathletes since launch as clearly been the more normal watch looking feel, versus the plastic and blocky feel of the Forerunner 920XT units. To that end the Fenix3 is effectively a Garmin FR920XT with additional features aimed primarily at the outdoor and hiking crowd – more than the triathlon crowd. The Fenix3 aims to further blend the multisport watch realm (previously dominated by the Garmin Forerunner series), with the outdoor watches (such as the Fenix1 & Fenix2, as well as outdoor handhelds).
0 kommentar(er)
